|
|
SUBJECT: |
1 |
DATE POSTED: |
8/29/2015 |
NAME: |
1 |
EMAIL: |
1 |
|
1 |
|
SUBJECT: |
1 |
DATE POSTED: |
8/29/2015 |
NAME: |
1 |
EMAIL: |
1 |
|
1 |
|
SUBJECT: |
1 |
DATE POSTED: |
8/29/2015 |
NAME: |
1 |
EMAIL: |
1 |
|
1 |
|
SUBJECT: |
1 |
DATE POSTED: |
8/29/2015 |
NAME: |
1 |
EMAIL: |
-1' |
|
1 |
|
SUBJECT: |
1 |
DATE POSTED: |
8/29/2015 |
NAME: |
1 |
EMAIL: |
1 |
|
1 |
|
SUBJECT: |
1 |
DATE POSTED: |
8/29/2015 |
NAME: |
-1' |
EMAIL: |
1 |
|
1 |
|
SUBJECT: |
1 |
DATE POSTED: |
8/29/2015 |
NAME: |
1 |
EMAIL: |
1 |
|
1 |
|
SUBJECT: |
President Stars |
DATE POSTED: |
10/29/2004 |
NAME: |
Julian Wells |
EMAIL: |
lustyalien@aol.com |
|
I appreciate your insight on the election. This is all so very intense.
However, toward the end of this article, almost as an afterthought, you start talking about the Presidential death cycle: You say "my own observations link this cycle with other factors," then jump to the conclusion that the next president will be subject to this in 2005. You offer zero documentation for this. StarIQ had a very comprehensive article on this subject called "Tecumseh's Curse and President Bush." I don't see how you can suddenly base your observations on such hollow information which differs from the very basis of this cycle.
I did enjoy the other part of your article though. It looks like a tough call. I also really liked the other article which was linked at the bottom. I wonder if the astrology can override such factors as voter fraud, disenfrancisement, an obsolete electoral college, lawyers and disputes, and a very broken system. I imagine we'll know soon enough.
|
|
|
return to article
|
|
|